Skip to content

LitLegal

Delhi High Court injuncted RANRAFT for being similar to RACIRAFT
Trade Mark

Delhi High Court injuncted RANRAFT for being similar to RACIRAFT

adminSeptember 30, 2024September 30, 2024

Case Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. vs. J.B. Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Anr. |CS (COMM) 369/2023 Product Category: Pharmaceutical Goods…

PIL AGAINST NETFLIX SERIES IC-814 WITHDRAWN!
Entertainment law

PIL AGAINST NETFLIX SERIES IC-814 WITHDRAWN!

adminSeptember 7, 2024September 7, 2024

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in the Delhi High Court seeking a directive to prohibit the Netflix series “IC…

ARROW V. SPARROW: Delhi HC restrains the use of word SPARROW for TAG FASTENERS
Trade DressTrade Mark

ARROW V. SPARROW: Delhi HC restrains the use of word SPARROW for TAG FASTENERS

adminJuly 29, 2024July 29, 2024

Brief: Type: Suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of Copyright, and Trade Mark against passing off. Dispute in brief: Plaintiff…

Delhi HC refuse to stay the release of TRIBHUVAN MISHRA CA TOPPER
Entertainment law

Delhi HC refuse to stay the release of TRIBHUVAN MISHRA CA TOPPER

adminJuly 16, 2024July 16, 2024

Netflix is gearing up for the release of its new drama, Tribhuvan Mishra CA Topper, which is already generating buzz…

Standard Essential Patents and FRAND License?
Patent

Standard Essential Patents and FRAND License?

adminJune 5, 2024June 5, 2024

Introduction Standard Essential Patents, also abbreviated as SEPs, are patents that claim inventions essential to a specific technical standard. These…

Post trade mark registration – prosecution docs are irrelevant – Telecare Judgment
Trade Mark

Post trade mark registration – prosecution docs are irrelevant – Telecare Judgment

adminMay 30, 2024May 30, 2024

Jurisprudence Deduced: POST GRANT OF REGISTRATION OF THE MARK NEITHER THE EXAMINATION REPORT NOR THE REPLY TO THE SAME ARE…

Delhi HC restrains Defendant from using COSAMIN
Trade Mark

Delhi HC restrains Defendant from using COSAMIN

adminMay 24, 2024May 24, 2024

Case: Sumil Chemical Industries P Ltd vs. UK Crop Sciences P Ltd | CS (COMM) 432/2024. Product category: Agro-chemical products…

Division Bench confirms injunction against Glenmark from using INDAMET
Trade Mark

Division Bench confirms injunction against Glenmark from using INDAMET

adminApril 19, 2024April 19, 2024

Brief Facts: Sun Pharma Laboratories found Glenmark’s mark INDAMET, an asthma drug, to be deceptively similar to its registered and…

Delhi High Court restrains Defendants from using ‘CAFTADAY’
Trade Mark

Delhi High Court restrains Defendants from using ‘CAFTADAY’

adminMarch 23, 2024March 23, 2024

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court injuncted Defendants from dealing in medicinal preparation with the mark CAFTADAY or any mark which…

Division Bench of Delhi High Court Upholds Injunction Against Crompton using “PEBBLE”
Trade Mark

Division Bench of Delhi High Court Upholds Injunction Against Crompton using “PEBBLE”

adminMarch 19, 2024March 19, 2024

The Hon’ble Division Bench presided by HMJ Amit Mahajan and HMJ Vibhu Bhakhru upheld the decision of the Ld. Single…

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Recent Posts

  • Hon’ble Court Grants Injunction in Favour of Sun Pharma Against Janricsan Pharma for Trade Mark Infringement
  • Delhi High Court found Teccnopro similar to Technosport
  • Delhi High Court found Tecchnoplus similar to Technosport
  • PRUEASE Medicine Not Deceptively Similar to PRO-EASE Sanitary Napkins
  • Delhi High Court found Tecdrisport similar to Technosport

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • November 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • September 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • July 2023

Categories

  • Copyright
  • Entertainment law
  • Patent
  • Trade Dress
  • Trade Mark
  • Uncategorized
Copyright © 2025 LitLegal | Legal News by Ascendoor | Powered by WordPress.