Hon’ble Court Grants Injunction in Favour of Sun Pharma Against Janricsan Pharma for Trade Mark Infringement

BRIEF PARTICULARS PLAINTIFFS DEFENDENTS Trade mark ‘SUN’/ ‘SUN PHARMA’/ ‘SUN PHARMACEUTICALS’ “JANRICSAN PHARMA P. LTD.” Registration / application status   SUN (Label) is a registered trade mark under no. 408870 dt. 04.08.1983 in class 5 claiming           use       from 01.01.1978, Registration is renewed and subsisting. There is no disclaimer.   SUN / SUN PHARMA has been…

Delhi High Court found Teccnopro similar to Technosport

BRIEF PARTICULARS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Trade mark / TECHNOSPORT / TECCNOPRO Registration / application status Registered under application no. 1819411 and 5434922 on 18″ May, 2009 and 04″ May, 2022 respectively Applied under no. 6331838 on 06.03.2024 as “Proposed to be used” basis in Class 25 . Present status is Objected. The Plaintiff filed a suit…

Delhi High Court found Tecchnoplus similar to Technosport

BRIEF PARTICULARS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Trade mark / TECHNOSPORT / TECCHNOPLUSS Registration / application status Registered under application no. 1819411 and 5434922 on 18″ May, 2009 and 04″ May, 2022 respectively Applied under no. 5755973 dt. 09.01.2023 as “Proposed to be used” basis in Class 25.     Subsequently, amended the trade mark application to ….

PRUEASE Medicine Not Deceptively Similar to PRO-EASE Sanitary Napkins

Brief overview: This case involves a trade mark dispute between RSPL Health Private Limited (Plaintiff) and Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited (Defendant No. 1) along with Hetero Labs Limited (Defendant No. 2). The Plaintiff sought an ad interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC to restrain the Defendants from using the…

technosport vs tecdrisport
Delhi High Court found Tecdrisport similar to Technosport

BRIEF PARTICULARS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Trade mark / TECHNOSPORT  / TECDRISPORT Registration / application status Registered under application no. 1819411 and 5434922 on 18″ May, 2009 and 04″ May, 2022 respectively Application no. 5469598 was filed which was opposed by Plaintiff dated 21.3.2024 The Plaintiff filed a suit for infringement of trade mark, copyright, and passing…

DELHI HIGH COURT FOUND PEPFIX-DSR AND MINOZIL SIMILAR TO PEPFIZ AND MINOZ

A suit was filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendants seeking permanent injunction restraining of trademarks, passing off, unfair competition, damages/rendition of accounts of profits and delivery up, etc. Plaintiff’s Trade Mark Defendant’s Trade Mark  PEPFIZ   Molecule: Papain, Fungal Diastase and Simethicone Use: Antacid Sold in the form: Effervescent tablets and sachets TM Registration…

DELHI HIGH COURT FOUND NEOVITAL AND PEPFIX SIMILAR TO REVITAL AND PEPFIZ

A suit was filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendants seeking permanent injunction restraining of trademarks, passing off, unfair competition, damages/rendition of accounts of profits and delivery up, etc. Competing Trade Marks Plaintiff’s Trade Mark Defendant’s Mark PEPFIZ   Molecule: Papain, Fungal Diastase And Simethicone Use: Antacid Sold in the form: Effervescent tablets and sachets….

Delhi High Court restrains “GOOD DAY” for Son Papdis, protecting Britannia’s rights.

CASE DETAILS: BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD v. DESI BITES SNACKS P LTD & ORS., CS(COMM) 983/2024 Product Category: Confectionery BRIEF: Particulars Plaintiff (Britannia Industries Ltd.) Defendant (Desi Bites Snack P Ltd.) Trade Mark GOOD DAY Registration No.- 452003 dt.-03.04.1986 GOOD DAY Registration Status Registered under Class 30 since 1986 Not Registered Products Biscuits, bread, and non-medicated confectionery…

RACIRAFT V RANRAFT
Delhi High Court injuncted RANRAFT for being similar to RACIRAFT

Case Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. vs. J.B. Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Anr. |CS (COMM) 369/2023 Product Category: Pharmaceutical Goods Brief: Particulars Plaintiff Defendant Trade Mark RACIRAFT RANRAFT Registration Status Application no. 5288739 Applied on – 17.01.2022 Registered on – 26.08.2022 Not registered Plaintiff filed a suit against Defendant for infringing its registered trade mark…

ARROW V. SPARROW: Delhi HC restrains the use of word SPARROW for TAG FASTENERS

Brief: Type: Suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of Copyright, and Trade Mark against passing off. Dispute in brief: Plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit against Defendants for dishonestly adopting a blue and white box packaging / trade dress containing a circular device for selling goods, namely TAG FASTENERS such as Tag Pins and Loops Pins;…