V GUARD VERSUS CROMPTON
Division Bench of Delhi High Court Upholds Injunction Against Crompton using “PEBBLE”

The Hon’ble Division Bench presided by HMJ Amit Mahajan and HMJ Vibhu Bhakhru upheld the decision of the Ld. Single Judge injuncting the Appellant (Crompton) from dealing in electric irons under the impugned mark “PEBBLE”. Why Appeal was preferred? Brief Facts: V-Guard’s mark Crompton’s mark Registered in Class 11 since 26.03.2013 for goods being water…

Medilice
Rs 10 Lakh Imposed, Defendant Restrained from Using ‘MEDILICE’

Brief: In the captioned matter, the Ld. Trial Court restrained the Defendant form using the mark MEDILICE post long drawn trial and awarded punitive damages of sum of Rs. 10 Lakhs against the Defendant. Furthermore, the mark MEDICLICE was declared WELL-KNOWN by the Ld. Court. Plaintiff: Wings Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Defendant: Kirit Bhadiadra Competing Marks:…

litlegal
2 Months Period for TM Opposition Evidence Upheld

Citation- 2024 SCC OnLine Del 813 PARTICULARS APPELLANT/OPPONENT RESPONDENTS/APPLICANT PARTY NAME SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD DABUR INDIA LTD. & ANR CORAM JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH CONFLICTING MARKS GLUCORED   Application No.- 681897 Filing Location- Mumbai DABUR GLUCORID KP (LABEL) Application No.-  1309040 Filing location – CHANDIGARH   PUBLISHED IN JOURNAL NO/ DATE OF PUBLICATION  …

High Courts’ Jurisdiction Where Dynamic Effect of Trade Marks is Felt

CASE TITLE– Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. v. Fast Cure Pharma, COURT–  HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT, NEW DELHI CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR CITATION– 2023 SCC OnLine Del 5409 Counsels for the Petitioner: Mr. Ranjan Narula, Mr. Shashi P. Ojha, Ms. Aishani Singh and Ms. Shivangi Kohli, Advs Counsels for the Respondent: Mr….

Aquasoft Ajanta Pharma
Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiting of Ajanta Pharma’s AQUA-SOFT

COURT – HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL PARTIES– AJANTA PHARMA LTD                                                                           ….. Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Ms. Prashansa Singh, Mr. Manan Mondal & Mr. Rohit Pradhan, Advs. versus M/S R.R. ENTERPRISES & ORS.                                                            …..Defendants        Through: Mr. Siddharth Chopra, Mr. Nitin Sharma,…

Draft Trade Marks (1st Amendment) Rules, 2024
Explained: Draft Trade Marks (1st Amendment) Rules, 2024

Recently, the Central Government has proposed the Draft rules to further amend the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 on 2nd January 2024. The notification is published and is available to the public. It invites objections/suggestions from any person w.r.t. this draft rules before 30 days of publication of this Draft rules, by addressing the same to…

Delhi High Court restrains ABBZORB in trademark infringement suit by Sun Pharma’s ABZORB

Brief Facts: Recently, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court decided on a trade mark infringement suit filed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd against Protrition Products LLP. The plaintiff, claimed infringement of their registered trade mark “ABZORB” against the defendants’ use of “ABBZORB” and “ABBZORB NUTRITION” in the market. Plaintiff’s Contentions: Plaintiff contended that they are the…

Delhi High Court restrains GLENMARK’S INDAMET in trademark infringement suit by Sun Pharma’s ISTAMET

Brief Facts: The Delhi High Court recently decided a trade mark case in CS(COMM) 711/2022, where Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. (the Plaintiff) filed an infringement suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (the Defendant) over the latter’s use of the mark “INDAMET,” which Sun Pharma argued was deceptively similar to its own mark “ISTAMET.” Plaintiff’s Contentions: Sun…