COSAMIL V. COSAMIN
Delhi HC restrains Defendant from using COSAMIN

Case: Sumil Chemical Industries P Ltd vs. UK Crop Sciences P Ltd | CS (COMM) 432/2024. Product category: Agro-chemical products Brief: Particulars Plaintiff Defendant Trade Mark COSAMIL, COSAMIL-DF, COSAMIL GOLD COSAMIN Earliest usage Since 2009  User claim 2015 Plaintiff filed a suit against the Defendant, for dealing in agro-chemical products under the impugned mark COSAMIN,…

INDAMET V ISTAMET
Division Bench confirms injunction against Glenmark from using INDAMET

Brief Facts: Sun Pharma Laboratories found Glenmark’s mark INDAMET, an asthma drug, to be deceptively similar to its registered and prior used trade mark ISTAMET, a diabetes drug. On 3rd July, 2023, the Learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court, Hon`ble Justice Sanjeev Narula, restrained Glenmark from manufacturing, selling, or advertising its drug under…

Delhi High Court restrains Defendants from using ‘CAFTADAY’

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court injuncted Defendants from dealing in medicinal preparation with the mark CAFTADAY or any mark which is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s mark CAFTA. Why suit was filed? Suit was filed seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining defendants from dealing with the mark CAFTADAY or any other mark deceptively similar…

V GUARD VERSUS CROMPTON
Division Bench of Delhi High Court Upholds Injunction Against Crompton using “PEBBLE”

The Hon’ble Division Bench presided by HMJ Amit Mahajan and HMJ Vibhu Bhakhru upheld the decision of the Ld. Single Judge injuncting the Appellant (Crompton) from dealing in electric irons under the impugned mark “PEBBLE”. Why Appeal was preferred? Brief Facts: V-Guard’s mark Crompton’s mark Registered in Class 11 since 26.03.2013 for goods being water…

Medilice
Rs 10 Lakh Imposed, Defendant Restrained from Using ‘MEDILICE’

Brief: In the captioned matter, the Ld. Trial Court restrained the Defendant form using the mark MEDILICE post long drawn trial and awarded punitive damages of sum of Rs. 10 Lakhs against the Defendant. Furthermore, the mark MEDICLICE was declared WELL-KNOWN by the Ld. Court. Plaintiff: Wings Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Defendant: Kirit Bhadiadra Competing Marks:…

litlegal
2 Months Period for TM Opposition Evidence Upheld

Citation- 2024 SCC OnLine Del 813 PARTICULARS APPELLANT/OPPONENT RESPONDENTS/APPLICANT PARTY NAME SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD DABUR INDIA LTD. & ANR CORAM JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH CONFLICTING MARKS GLUCORED   Application No.- 681897 Filing Location- Mumbai DABUR GLUCORID KP (LABEL) Application No.-  1309040 Filing location – CHANDIGARH   PUBLISHED IN JOURNAL NO/ DATE OF PUBLICATION  …

High Courts’ Jurisdiction Where Dynamic Effect of Trade Marks is Felt

CASE TITLE– Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. v. Fast Cure Pharma, COURT–  HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT, NEW DELHI CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR CITATION– 2023 SCC OnLine Del 5409 Counsels for the Petitioner: Mr. Ranjan Narula, Mr. Shashi P. Ojha, Ms. Aishani Singh and Ms. Shivangi Kohli, Advs Counsels for the Respondent: Mr….

Aquasoft Ajanta Pharma
Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiting of Ajanta Pharma’s AQUA-SOFT

COURT – HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL PARTIES– AJANTA PHARMA LTD                                                                           ….. Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Ms. Prashansa Singh, Mr. Manan Mondal & Mr. Rohit Pradhan, Advs. versus M/S R.R. ENTERPRISES & ORS.                                                            …..Defendants        Through: Mr. Siddharth Chopra, Mr. Nitin Sharma,…

Draft Trade Marks (1st Amendment) Rules, 2024
Explained: Draft Trade Marks (1st Amendment) Rules, 2024

Recently, the Central Government has proposed the Draft rules to further amend the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 on 2nd January 2024. The notification is published and is available to the public. It invites objections/suggestions from any person w.r.t. this draft rules before 30 days of publication of this Draft rules, by addressing the same to…