Delhi High Court found Teccnopro similar to Technosport
BRIEF PARTICULARS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Trade mark / TECHNOSPORT / TECCNOPRO Registration / application status Registered under application no. 1819411 and…
Category: Trade Mark
Delhi High Court found Tecchnoplus similar to Technosport
BRIEF PARTICULARS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Trade mark / TECHNOSPORT / TECCHNOPLUSS Registration / application status Registered under application no. 1819411 and…
PRUEASE Medicine Not Deceptively Similar to PRO-EASE Sanitary Napkins
Brief overview: This case involves a trade mark dispute between RSPL Health Private Limited (Plaintiff) and Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited…
Delhi High Court found Tecdrisport similar to Technosport
BRIEF PARTICULARS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Trade mark / TECHNOSPORT / TECDRISPORT Registration / application status Registered under application no. 1819411 and…
DELHI HIGH COURT FOUND PEPFIX-DSR AND MINOZIL SIMILAR TO PEPFIZ AND MINOZ
A suit was filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendants seeking permanent injunction restraining of trademarks, passing off, unfair competition,…
DELHI HIGH COURT FOUND NEOVITAL AND PEPFIX SIMILAR TO REVITAL AND PEPFIZ
A suit was filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendants seeking permanent injunction restraining of trademarks, passing off, unfair competition,…
Delhi High Court restrains “GOOD DAY” for Son Papdis, protecting Britannia’s rights.
CASE DETAILS: BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD v. DESI BITES SNACKS P LTD & ORS., CS(COMM) 983/2024 Product Category: Confectionery BRIEF: Particulars Plaintiff…
Delhi High Court injuncted RANRAFT for being similar to RACIRAFT
Case Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. vs. J.B. Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Anr. |CS (COMM) 369/2023 Product Category: Pharmaceutical Goods…
ARROW V. SPARROW: Delhi HC restrains the use of word SPARROW for TAG FASTENERS
Brief: Type: Suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of Copyright, and Trade Mark against passing off. Dispute in brief: Plaintiff…
Post trade mark registration – prosecution docs are irrelevant – Telecare Judgment
Jurisprudence Deduced: POST GRANT OF REGISTRATION OF THE MARK NEITHER THE EXAMINATION REPORT NOR THE REPLY TO THE SAME ARE…